Kirby v. Ashford

213 So. 3d 1147, 2017 La. LEXIS 616
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 24, 2017
DocketNO. 2017-C-152
StatusPublished

This text of 213 So. 3d 1147 (Kirby v. Ashford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirby v. Ashford, 213 So. 3d 1147, 2017 La. LEXIS 616 (La. 2017).

Opinion

Hughes, J.,

dissents and would grant the writ.

11 The Employer’s Liability Exclusion is not ambiguous. But neither is the Contractual Liability Exclusion. One provides cov[1148]*1148erage, one does not. The policy therefore is ambiguous as a whole.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 So. 3d 1147, 2017 La. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-ashford-la-2017.