Kirby of Southeast Denver, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Colorado Court of Appeals

Kirby of Southeast Denver, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

732 P.2d 1232, 1986 Colo. App. LEXIS 1159

CourtColorado Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 4, 1986

DocketNo. 85CA0623

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 732 P.2d 1232 (Kirby of Southeast Denver, Inc. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirby of Southeast Denver, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 732 P.2d 1232, 1986 Colo. App. LEXIS 1159 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiff, Kirby of Southeast Denver, Inc. (Kirby), seeks review of the order of the Industrial Commission finding it liable for unemployment insurance taxes prior to April 12, 1983. We affirm.

Kirby contends that it should not be liable for the back taxes because § 8-70-103(ll)(a)(2)(L), C.R.S. (1985 Cum.Supp.) which presently exempts it from paying the tax, should be applied retroactively to the period preceding its effective date of April 12, 1983. We disagree.

A statute is presumed to be prospective in its application. Section 2-4-202, C.R.S. (1980 Repl.Vol. 18) see also Colo. Const, art. II, § 11. And, an amendment to a statute is not to be given retroactive application unless a contrary intent is clearly manifested therein. McCartney v. West Adams County Fire Protection District, 40 Colo.App. 330, 574 P.2d 516 (1978). Further, pursuant to § 2-4-303, C.R.S. (1980 Repl.Vol. 18) the amendment of a statute shall not release, extinguish, or change in whole or in part any liability which was incurred under the statute before it was amended, unless the amending act expressly so provides.

Here, the Industrial Commission found that Kirby had incurred liability for unemployment insurance taxes prior to April 12, 1983. The fact that Kirby may not have been aware of its liability before that date does not in any way negate the fact that it existed under the statute at that time.

Kirby’s other contentions are also without merit.

The order of the Industrial Commission is affirmed.

STERNBERG and BABCOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiff, Kirby of Southeast Denver, Inc. (Kirby), seeks review of the order of the Industrial Commission finding it liable for unemployment insurance taxes prior to April 12, 1983. We affirm.

Kirby contends that it should not be liable for the back taxes because § 8-70-103(ll)(a)(2)(L), C.R.S. (1985 Cum.Supp.) which presently exempts it from paying the tax, should be applied retroactively to the period preceding its effective date of April 12, 1983. We disagree.

A statute is presumed to be prospective in its application. Section 2-4-202, C.R.S. (1980 Repl.Vol. 18) see also Colo. Const, art. II, § 11. And, an amendment to a statute is not to be given retroactive application unless a contrary intent is clearly manifested therein. McCartney v. West Adams County Fire Protection District, 40 Colo.App. 330, 574 P.2d 516 (1978). Further, pursuant to § 2-4-303, C.R.S. (1980 Repl.Vol. 18) the amendment of a statute shall not release, extinguish, or change in whole or in part any liability which was incurred under the statute before it was amended, unless the amending act expressly so provides.

Here, the Industrial Commission found that Kirby had incurred liability for unemployment insurance taxes prior to April 12, 1983. The fact that Kirby may not have been aware of its liability before that date does not in any way negate the fact that it existed under the statute at that time.

Kirby’s other contentions are also without merit.

The order of the Industrial Commission is affirmed.

STERNBERG and BABCOCK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 P.2d 1232, 1986 Colo. App. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-of-southeast-denver-inc-v-industrial-commission-coloctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack