Kirberg v. Edenfield Plumbing Co.

196 So. 2d 435, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3968
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 1967
DocketNo. 35918
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 435 (Kirberg v. Edenfield Plumbing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirberg v. Edenfield Plumbing Co., 196 So. 2d 435, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3968 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [436]*436there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 2d 435, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirberg-v-edenfield-plumbing-co-fla-1967.