Kiran v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided January 10, 2023·No. 6:19-cv-01548-SI·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JUNE KIRAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:19-cv-01548-SI

vs. SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO COMMISSIONER, EAJA Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”), it is ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $2,430.65 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, in addition to the $13,813.00 EAJA fees previously awarded by this Court in the above-captioned case. Payment of this award shall be made by check payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010), the award shall be made payable to Katherine L. Eitenmiller, WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C., if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the federal treasury offset program. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above. There are no supplemental costs or expenses to be paid herein.

DATED this 10th day of January 2023.

Lopes H. SIMON United States District Judge

Proposed Order submitted by: Katherine L. Eitenmiller WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, PC. 474 Willamette Street Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 686-1969 keitenmiller@ wmetattorneys.com Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - 2 6:19-cv-01548-SI

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kiran v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2023).

Kiran v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Kiran v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)