Kiraly v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees Local 2250
This text of 583 F. App'x 80 (Kiraly v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees Local 2250) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Maria S. Kiraly appeals from the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion to dismiss, dismissing her complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and denying her request to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the briefs on appeal and the record, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * (J.A. at 73-82). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
In addition, we note that, on appeal, Kiraly untimely raises a retaliation claim pursuant to the Labor-Management Recording and Disclosure Act ("LMRDA”) which was not raised below. However, even if we considered the LMRDA claim on the merits, this statute is not applicable to state employees. See 29 U.S.C. § 402(e) (2012); Smith v. Office and Professional Employees Int'l Union, 821 F.2d 355, 355-56 (6th Cir.1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiraly-v-american-federation-of-state-county-municipal-employees-local-ca4-2014.