Kippen & Co. v. Carr's

4 Munf. 119, 18 Va. 119, 1814 Va. LEXIS 11
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedJanuary 5, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 119 (Kippen & Co. v. Carr's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kippen & Co. v. Carr's, 4 Munf. 119, 18 Va. 119, 1814 Va. LEXIS 11 (Va. 1814).

Opinion

The following opinion of this court was delivered by

Judge Roane.

“ The court is of opinion that the judgment of the Superior Court, rendered upon the case agreed between the parties in this cause, is erroneous in this, that the defence therein set up in bar of the appellant’s demand is not sufficient in law to bar or preclude the same; — the rule being that, as a testator may be bountiful as well as just in the disposition of his estate, so his legal representatives are the proper judges of his ability in that particular; and that their ability to pay his debts as well as legacies is acknowledged by their delivering up legacies to those entitled thereto;— and, also, because the law, foreseeing that there might be dormant debts not known to the executor or administrator at the time of his payment of the legacies, has provided a mean by which he is'indemnified against the same. On this ground, the judgment is reversed with costs ; and judgment is to be entered for the appellant according to the verdict of the jury.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGlaughlin v. McGlaughlin's Legatees
27 S.E. 378 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Munf. 119, 18 Va. 119, 1814 Va. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kippen-co-v-carrs-va-1814.