Kipp v. Kipp
78 A. 682, 77 N.J. Eq. 585, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 285
Opinion
The- decree appealed from wilL be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Learning in the court below.
For affirmance■ — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Dill, Congdon — 12.
For reversal — -Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kipp v. Kipp, 78 A. 682, 77 N.J. Eq. 585, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1910).
78 A. 682 (Kipp v. Kipp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. Thomas
166 A. 322 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)
Eugster v. Eugster
101 A. 575 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1917)