Kipp Flores Architects, L.L.C. v. Hallmark Design Homes, L.P.
This text of 544 F. App'x 553 (Kipp Flores Architects, L.L.C. v. Hallmark Design Homes, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kipp Flores Architects, L.L.C. (“KFA”), sued Hallmark Design Homes, L.P. (“Hallmark”), for copyright infringement in building houses based on KFA’s architectural plans without purchasing the plans for each house as required. A jury found Hallmark liable and awarded substantial damages. Hallmark appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support a jury finding of “substantial similarity” and that the damages are inappropriate as a matter of law because KFA did not meet its burden of proof.
We have reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and the pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. The case was well tried by the magistrate judge sitting by consent. There is no error, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
544 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kipp-flores-architects-llc-v-hallmark-design-homes-lp-ca5-2013.