Kipfinger v. G.F. Obstetrical

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kipfinger v. G.F. Obstetrical. Read the opinion of the Court — 411 Mont. 269
Montana Supreme Court·Decided July 11, 2022·No. DA 21-0552·Unpublished

Opinion

07/11/2022

1 Case Number: DA 21-0552

3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 4 CAUSE NO. DA 21-0552 ) 5 STEPHANIE KIPFINGER, BEN ) SUPREME COURT CAUSE No. CUNNINGHAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ) DA 21-0552 6 NATURAL GUARDIAN AND NEXT ) FRIEND OF EVERETT CUNNINGHAM, A ) 7 MINOR, ) ORDER GRANTING ) EXTENSION OF TIME 8 Plaintiffs and Appellants, ) FOR APPELLANTS TO FILE ) REPLY BRIEF 9 vs. ) ) 10 GREAT FALLS OBSTETRICAL AND ) GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, AND ) 11 JULIE KUYKENDALL. ) ) 12 Defendants and Appellees. )

13 UPON REVIEW of the Appellants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply

14 Brief (Unopposed) and with good cause being shown first;

15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant’s Deadline to File their Reply Brief

16 presently set for the 12th day of July, 2022 is hereby VACATED and RESET for the 24th

17 day of August, 2022.

18 No further extensions will be granted.

19 ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

20 CC: 21 - Appellants: o Daniel J. Flaherty 22 o Will Ballew o Ben Novotny 23 o Michael Brooks - Appellee, c/o Gary Kalkstein 24

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath 1 Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court July 11 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kipfinger v. G.F. Obstetrical, (Mo. 2022).

Kipfinger v. G.F. Obstetrical (Kipfinger v. G.F. Obstetrical) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.