Kinzue Pine Mills Company v. E. E. Anderson Lumber Company
This text of 185 F.2d 855 (Kinzue Pine Mills Company v. E. E. Anderson Lumber Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
185 F.2d 855
KINZUE PINE MILLS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Virgil F.
Schultz and Charles Upton Shreve, Receiver
Pendente Lite, Appellants,
v.
E. E. ANDERSON LUMBER COMPANY, a Michigan corporation,
Debtor and John E. Murphy, Receiver, Appellees.
No. 11075.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 13, 1950.
Frederick B. Darden, Fred G. Dewey, and Dickinson, Wright, Davis McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
Clark, Klein, Brucker & Waples, Detroit, Mich., and Freud, Markus, Gilbert & Lubbers, Detroit, Mich., for appellees.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On reading and filing the Stipulation in this appeal for dismissal and discontinuance or the appeal taken on behalf of Appellant, Charles Upton Shreve, Receiver Pendente Lite, and it appearing that the appeals of Kinzue Pine Mills Company, a Delaware corporation, and Virgil F. Schultz, the other appellants, have heretofore, by Stipulation filed with this Court, been dismissed and discontinued and the Court being fully advised in the premises,
It is ordered that the appeals herein be and are hereby dismissed and discontinued with prejudice and without cost to any party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinzue-pine-mills-company-v-e-e-anderson-lumber-company-ca6-1950.