Kinyon v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kinyon v. Leonard

24 A. 224, 149 Pa. 318, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1128

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 23, 1892

DocketAppeal, No. 390

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A. 224 (Kinyon v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinyon v. Leonard, 24 A. 224, 149 Pa. 318, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1128 (Pa. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was properly entered. The title to the real estate in question was in Alice E. Harvey, [320]*320and there was nothing upon the face of it to show that Anderson Harvey, her husband, had any interest therein. The judgment and execution against the husband did not appear in the line of title. As Mrs. Harvey acquired the' property from a stranger, and not from or through her husband, there was nothing to put a purchaser upon notice.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was properly entered. The title to the real estate in question was in Alice E. Harvey, [320]*320and there was nothing upon the face of it to show that Anderson Harvey, her husband, had any interest therein. The judgment and execution against the husband did not appear in the line of title. As Mrs. Harvey acquired the' property from a stranger, and not from or through her husband, there was nothing to put a purchaser upon notice.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A. 224, 149 Pa. 318, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinyon-v-leonard-pa-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack