Kinyon v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kinyon v. Leonard

24 A. 224, 149 Pa. 318, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1128

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 1892·No. Appeal, No. 390·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was properly entered. The title to the real estate in question was in Alice E. Harvey, [320] and there was nothing upon the face of it to show that Anderson Harvey, her husband, had any interest therein. The judgment and execution against the husband did not appear in the line of title. As Mrs. Harvey acquired the' property from a stranger, and not from or through her husband, there was nothing to put a purchaser upon notice.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was properly entered. The title to the real estate in question was in Alice E. Harvey, [320] and there was nothing upon the face of it to show that Anderson Harvey, her husband, had any interest therein. The judgment and execution against the husband did not appear in the line of title. As Mrs. Harvey acquired the' property from a stranger, and not from or through her husband, there was nothing to put a purchaser upon notice.

Judgment affirmed.

Kinyon v. Leonard, 24 A. 224, 149 Pa. 318, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1128 (Pa. 1892).

Pincite

24 A. 224 (Kinyon v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related