Kintzel v. Kintzel

Lebanon County Court of Common Pleas

Kintzel v. Kintzel

133 Pa. 71, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 874

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County

DecidedMarch 3, 1890

DocketNo. 240

StatusPublished

This text of 133 Pa. 71 (Kintzel v. Kintzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kintzel v. Kintzel, 133 Pa. 71, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 874 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Pm Curiam:

The question whether the judgment No. 42 November Term 1886, confessed by Henry D. Kintzel to Mary Kintzel, was collusive, and intended to delay and defraud the creditors of said Henry, has been settled in favor of the integrity of the [77]*77judgment by tbe finding of the auditor, approved by the learned court below. It needs no argument to show that the declarations of Henry D. Kintzel, made in the absence of the said Mary Kintzel, as to the consideration of the judgment, were inadmissible to affect the latter. The assignments of error do not raise any question as to interest upon the arrears of dower.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pm Curiam:

The question whether the judgment No. 42 November Term 1886, confessed by Henry D. Kintzel to Mary Kintzel, was collusive, and intended to delay and defraud the creditors of said Henry, has been settled in favor of the integrity of the [77]*77judgment by tbe finding of the auditor, approved by the learned court below. It needs no argument to show that the declarations of Henry D. Kintzel, made in the absence of the said Mary Kintzel, as to the consideration of the judgment, were inadmissible to affect the latter. The assignments of error do not raise any question as to interest upon the arrears of dower.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 Pa. 71, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kintzel-v-kintzel-pactcompllebano-1890.