Kintner v. State ex rel. Skelton

Indiana Supreme Court

Kintner v. State ex rel. Skelton

3 Ind. 92

DecidedNovember 15, 1851

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ind. 92 (Kintner v. State ex rel. Skelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kintner v. State ex rel. Skelton, 3 Ind. 92 (Ind. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

This was an action of debt brought by The State on the relation of Skelton, school commissioner, against Kintner, Heth, Coidson, and others, on the official bond of Kintner, as former school commissioner, executed on the 3d of March, 1840.

J. W. Wright, O. H. Smith, and S. Yandes, for the plaintiffs. D. D, Pratt, for the defendants.

The same errors are assigned as in the next preceding case, and the judgment must be affirmed for the reasons given in that case.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with 2 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

This was an action of debt brought by The State on the relation of Skelton, school commissioner, against Kintner, Heth, Coidson, and others, on the official bond of Kintner, as former school commissioner, executed on the 3d of March, 1840.

J. W. Wright, O. H. Smith, and S. Yandes, for the plaintiffs. D. D, Pratt, for the defendants.

The same errors are assigned as in the next preceding case, and the judgment must be affirmed for the reasons given in that case.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with 2 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ind. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kintner-v-state-ex-rel-skelton-ind-1851.