Kinster v. Smith

284 S.W.2d 326
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 18, 1955·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Elliott Circuit Court.

This is the second appearance of these cases in this court. In Kinster v. Smith (Kinster v. Wagoner), 311 Ky. 325, 224 S.W.2d 156, the trial court’s judgment was held erroneous because of uncertainty. On the return of the case, the surveyor filed an amended report to which exceptions were entered by appellant. The trial court overruled these exceptions.

[327] We have reviewed the record and find no error which we consider prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights.

Motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinster v. Smith, 284 S.W.2d 326 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).

284 S.W.2d 326 (Kinster v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinster v. Smith
224 S.W.2d 156 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1949)