Kinster v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Kinster v. Smith

284 S.W.2d 326

DecidedNovember 18, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 284 S.W.2d 326 (Kinster v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinster v. Smith, 284 S.W.2d 326 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Elliott Circuit Court.

This is the second appearance of these cases in this court. In Kinster v. Smith (Kinster v. Wagoner), 311 Ky. 325, 224 S.W.2d 156, the trial court’s judgment was held erroneous because of uncertainty. On the return of the case, the surveyor filed an amended report to which exceptions were entered by appellant. The trial court overruled these exceptions.

[327]*327We have reviewed the record and find no error which we consider prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights.

Motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Elliott Circuit Court.

This is the second appearance of these cases in this court. In Kinster v. Smith (Kinster v. Wagoner), 311 Ky. 325, 224 S.W.2d 156, the trial court’s judgment was held erroneous because of uncertainty. On the return of the case, the surveyor filed an amended report to which exceptions were entered by appellant. The trial court overruled these exceptions.

[327]*327We have reviewed the record and find no error which we consider prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights.

Motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 S.W.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinster-v-smith-kyctapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack