Kinsman v. Kinsman
1 Root 180
Opinion
The rye was the property of said Robert, and did not pass by the bequest of personal estate: not being severed from the land; the executor had right to enter and cut it, notwithstanding said Bethiah had an estate for life in the leased premises.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kinsman v. Kinsman, 1 Root 180 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
1 Root 180 (Kinsman v. Kinsman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.