Kinsley v. Norris

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Kinsley v. Norris

61 N.H. 639

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 15, 1881·Published

Opinion

Subject to the plaintiff’s exception, the court granted certain motions made by the defendants, and denied certain other motions [640]*640made by tbe plaintiff. The exceptions were overruled on the ground that they raised no question of law.

C. It. Morrison and F. D. Currier, for the plaintiff. Carpenter Carpenter, Burleigh Adams, Bingham, Mitchell $ Batchellor, and Bingham Aldrich, for the defendants. Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Subject to the plaintiff’s exception, the court granted certain motions made by the defendants, and denied certain other motions [640]*640made by tbe plaintiff. The exceptions were overruled on the ground that they raised no question of law.

C. It. Morrison and F. D. Currier, for the plaintiff. Carpenter Carpenter, Burleigh Adams, Bingham, Mitchell $ Batchellor, and Bingham Aldrich, for the defendants. Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Kinsley v. Norris, 61 N.H. 639 (N.H. 1881).

Pincite

61 N.H. 639 (Kinsley v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.