Kinsler, Matthew v. Rogers Development and Williams Construction

2020 TN WC 20
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedFebruary 10, 2020
Docket2017-02-0591
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 20 (Kinsler, Matthew v. Rogers Development and Williams Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinsler, Matthew v. Rogers Development and Williams Construction, 2020 TN WC 20 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

FILED Feb 11, 2020

11:41 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT GRAY MATTHEW KINSLER, ) Docket No. 2017-02-0591 Employee, ) V. ) ROGERS DEVELOPMENT and ) State File No. 78125-2017 WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, ) Employers, ) and ) BUILDERS MUTUAL INSURANCE, ) Judge Brian K. Addington Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

The Court conducted an Expedited Hearing on February 6, 2020, on the issue of whether Mr. Kinsler is entitled to a panel of physicians for a September 8, 2017 injury to his scrotum and testes. The Court holds he presented sufficient evidence that he is likely to prevail at trial and is entitled to a panel or urologists.

Claim History

Mr. Kinsler fell approximately ten feet through a floor onto a concrete slab. He reported the accident to his uninsured employer, Williams Construction. His employer tried to get him to walk off the pain and relax over the following days, but Mr. Kinsler eventually went to the emergency room on September 10. There he complained of many symptoms including pain in his scrotum. The physicians informed him that he fractured his spine at L-1, ordered a brace, and released him. Mr. Kinsler returned to the emergency room on September 14 with pain and swelling in his legs and testes. The providers performed an ultrasound of his testes but found no abnormalities.

Through the two emergency room visits, Mr. Kinsler treated on his own, but then the general contractor, Rogers Development, accepted his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Since the injury, he continued to experience swelling and a pulling in his testes. His authorized back doctor, Richard Duncan, M.D., heard Mr.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION Kinsler’s complaints and made a urological referral at his request, but Dr. Duncan could not state whether the need for the referral primarily related to Mr. Kinsler’s work- accident.

Although Mr. Kinsler does not suffer constant pain or swelling, he wishes to have the condition evaluated, and his attorney requested the issue be included on the Dispute Certification Notice from July 2018. On the other hand, Rogers Development refuses to provide treatment because Mr. Kinsler has not always requested it and has not presented any expert medical evidence that his condition is work-related.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Kinsler must present sufficient evidence establishing that he is likely to prove at trial that he is entitled to the requested workers’ compensation benefits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019). An employer is obligated to provide medical benefits made reasonably necessary by the accident. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 204(a)(1)(A).

The evidence establishes that the first and second time Mr. Kinsler sought medical treatment after his injury, he complained about pain in his scrotum and testes. However, Rogers Development has not provided any treatment for this concern, even though Mr. Kinsler at times requested it. He also requested a referral to a specialist from Dr. Duncan.

Although Mr. Kinsler has not constantly complained of or demanded treatment for his testicular pain, the Court cannot find anything in the Worker’s Compensation Law that requires an employee to constantly suffer pain and demand treatment before an employer is obligated to provide necessary and reasonable medical treatment.

Considering Mr. Kinsler complained of scrotum and testes pain soon after the incident and testified that he continues to experience intermittent pain and pulling, and because no medical opinion addressed the issue, the Court finds he would likely succeed at trial as to whether Rogers Development should provide him a panel of physicians.

The Court holds that Rogers Development shall provide Mr. Kinsler a panel of urologists and set an appointment for evaluation and treatment that the physician determines is reasonable and necessary due to his accident.

' The Court finds Dr. Duncan’s opinion unpersuasive because he is not a urologist and he cannot state whether the need for treatment is related to the injury.

Z IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Mr. Kinsler’s request for medical treatment is granted. Rogers Development shall provide him a panel of urologists and set an appointment for evaluation and treatment that the physician determines is reasonable and necessary due to his accident.

2. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period of compliance might result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED February 11, 2020.

/S/ BRIAN K. ADDINGTON BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX Exhibits:

. Affidavit of Matthew Kinsler . First Report of Injury . Wage Statement . Time Sheet . Employee’s Choice of Physician Form . Medical Records of Dr. Richard Duncan . Final Medical Report . (Col.) Medical Records A. Dr. Richard Duncan B. Dr. Richard Duncan Questionnaire response C. Indian Path Medical Center 9. (Col.) Records A. Recorded Audio Statement

hWN

om NN B. Deposition Transcript C. Physician Panel (10/30/2018) D. Physician Panel (11/21/2018) E. Employee’s Responses to Interrogatories F. Employer’s Responses to Requests for Production G. Dispute Certification Notice H. Settlement Check I. Wage Statement J. Request for Expedited Hearing and Affidavit K. Original and Amended PBD L. All medical Records filed by Employer M. Request for Medical Releases 10. Counsel and Carrier notes 11. Matthew Kinsler’s Deposition Transcript 12. Nurse Case Manager Notes 13. Dr. Richard Duncan Questionnaire Response 14. (Col.) Photos

Technical Record:

. Petition for Benefit Determination

. Dispute Certification Notice

. Employer’s Notice of Filing of Medical Records for Expedited Hearing

. Employer’s Tenn. Comp. Rules and Regs. Submission

. Employee’s Pre-Expedited Hearing Submission

. Employee’s Witness and Exhibit List

. Employee’s Amended Pre-Expedited Hearing Submission

. Employee’s Amended Witness and Exhibit Lists

. Employer’s Reply to Employee’s Amended Expedited Hearing Submission

OOrANNM PWN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that copy of this order was sent on February 11, 2020.

Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to: Mail Charlton DeVault, X | crdevault@charter.net Employee’s Attorney Meredith Weaver, X | meredith.weaver@petersonwhite.com Employer’s Attorney Williams Xx 400 Elm Street Construction Mt. Carmel, TN 37645

fare Mun

PENNY SII KUM, Court Clerk WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinsler-matthew-v-rogers-development-and-williams-construction-tennworkcompcl-2020.