Kinsey v. Sherman
This text of 46 Iowa 463 (Kinsey v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“ An act to provide for the improvement of the penitentiary [465]*465at Fort Madison, Iowa, and to provide for the increased salary of the clerk thereof.”
Section 1 provides, “That there is hereby appropriated out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, or as much thereof as may be necessary for the several objects named, viz: For the purpose of putting in gas-works, the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars; for the purpose of salary of teachers, one thousand two hundred dollars; for increase of clerk’s salary, five hundred dollars * * * .”
Chapter 51 of the private and local laws of the same session of the General Assembly was approved March 18, 1874, and took effect March 24, 1874.
This act provided that the clerk of the additional penitentiary at Anamosa should “receive pay in the same sum and manner” as the clerk at Fort Madison.
There can be no doubt that when this act was approved and took effect, each of said clerks was entitled to receive $62.50 per month, and without further legislation neither would be entitled to an increase. Its proper construction, taken in connection with section 4783 of the Code, was that the clerk at Anamosa should receive $62.50 per month.
Subsequently the legislature enacted chapter 76, making an appropriation of $500 for an increase of the salary of the clerk at Fort Madison. This was an appropriation for the specific purpose named. It made no appropriation for the compensation of any officers other than those named in the act. It is an appropriation act for specific purposes and appropriates specific amounts of money and cannot be held to include other objects or purposes.
"We do not think that by any fair rule of construction the act fixing the salary of the clerk at Anamosa can be construed to have reference to the act subsequently passed, making an appropriation for the payment of the clerk at Fort Madison.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Iowa 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinsey-v-sherman-iowa-1877.