Kinsey v. Sheriff

584 P.2d 158, 94 Nev. 596, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 626
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1978·No. No. 10955·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order denying a pretrial habeas [597]*597corpus challenge to a justice court’s order denying Florence Kinsey’s motion for the production of certain records.

There is no provision in the habeas corpus statutes (NRS 34.360-NRS 34.680) which permits a pretrial challenge to an order denying a motion for discovery. Neither is there a provision for interlocutory appellate review of such orders.1 Therefore, the habeas petition was not cognizable in the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand this case with instructions to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Cf. Sheriff v. Toston, 93 Nev. 394, 566 P.2d 411 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinsey v. Sheriff, 584 P.2d 158, 94 Nev. 596, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 626 (Neb. 1978).

584 P.2d 158 (Kinsey v. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Obermeyer (Mark) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court, 2019