Kinsey v. Sheriff
This text of 584 P.2d 158 (Kinsey v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal from an order denying a pretrial habeas [597]*597corpus challenge to a justice court’s order denying Florence Kinsey’s motion for the production of certain records.
There is no provision in the habeas corpus statutes (NRS 34.360-NRS 34.680) which permits a pretrial challenge to an order denying a motion for discovery. Neither is there a provision for interlocutory appellate review of such orders.1 Therefore, the habeas petition was not cognizable in the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand this case with instructions to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Cf. Sheriff v. Toston, 93 Nev. 394, 566 P.2d 411 (1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 P.2d 158, 94 Nev. 596, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinsey-v-sheriff-nev-1978.