Kinsey v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad

35 A.2d 888, 131 N.J.L. 161, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kinsey v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 N.J.L. 285
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 27, 1944·Published

Opinion

*162 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinsey v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 35 A.2d 888, 131 N.J.L. 161, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 162 (N.J. 1944).

35 A.2d 888 (Kinsey v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.