Kinsey v. American Hardwood Manufacturing Co.
This text of 94 N.Y.S. 455 (Kinsey v. American Hardwood Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears that the defendant did not remain in New York for the purpose of attending to business after the trial. He departed from the city within a reasonable time after the trial, and did not remain longer than was necessary to take an early train for home. Having acted reasonably under the circumstances, he was exempt from service, and the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 ' COStSi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.Y.S. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinsey-v-american-hardwood-manufacturing-co-nyappterm-1905.