Kinsey v. American Hardwood Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kinsey v. American Hardwood Manufacturing Co.

94 N.Y.S. 455

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 22, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears that the defendant did not remain in New York for the purpose of attending to business after the trial. He departed from the city within a reasonable time after the trial, and did not remain longer than was necessary to take an early train for home. Having acted reasonably under the circumstances, he was exempt from service, and the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 ' COStSi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears that the defendant did not remain in New York for the purpose of attending to business after the trial. He departed from the city within a reasonable time after the trial, and did not remain longer than was necessary to take an early train for home. Having acted reasonably under the circumstances, he was exempt from service, and the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 ' COStSi

Kinsey v. American Hardwood Manufacturing Co., 94 N.Y.S. 455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

94 N.Y.S. 455 (Kinsey v. American Hardwood Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.