Kinsella v. Kern

New York Supreme Court

Kinsella v. Kern

168 Misc. 847, 6 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1954

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 12, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 168 Misc. 847 (Kinsella v. Kern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinsella v. Kern, 168 Misc. 847, 6 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1954 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Frankenthaler, J.

The reclassification of the positions by the civil service commission could not validly effect the removal of the then incumbents, and the latter could retain their positions without the necessity of taking any examination, competitive or qualifying. In Matter of Sandford v. Finegan (276 N. Y. 70) the Court of Appeals, in discussing the rights of a person occupying a position with no definite tenure, said (p. 73): “ He would be continued in the position without taking an examination after the position had been placed in the competitive class (Matter of Fornara v. Schroeder, 261 N. Y. 363). This view of the law has been followed by the Attorney-General and the civil service authorities for the past thirty years.” It was only because the petitioner in the Sandford case had been appointed for a definite term, which had expired, that the Court of Appeals relied upon an act of the Legislature which conferred tenure of office during good behavior. The commission could not, by reclassifying positions and placing them in the competitive class, remove the persons then legally occupying the positions, nor could it require said persons to pass examinations in order to retain their positions. (Matter of Sugden v. Partridge, 174 N. Y. 87; Matter of Fornara v. Schroeder, supra; Opinion of the Attorney-General, 24 State Dept. Rep. 383. See, also, Matter of Sandford v. Finegan, N. Y. L. J. March 10, 1937, p. 1201.)

The motion is accordingly granted. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankenthaler, J.

The reclassification of the positions by the civil service commission could not validly effect the removal of the then incumbents, and the latter could retain their positions without the necessity of taking any examination, competitive or qualifying. In Matter of Sandford v. Finegan (276 N. Y. 70) the Court of Appeals, in discussing the rights of a person occupying a position with no definite tenure, said (p. 73): “ He would be continued in the position without taking an examination after the position had been placed in the competitive class (Matter of Fornara v. Schroeder, 261 N. Y. 363). This view of the law has been followed by the Attorney-General and the civil service authorities for the past thirty years.” It was only because the petitioner in the Sandford case had been appointed for a definite term, which had expired, that the Court of Appeals relied upon an act of the Legislature which conferred tenure of office during good behavior. The commission could not, by reclassifying positions and placing them in the competitive class, remove the persons then legally occupying the positions, nor could it require said persons to pass examinations in order to retain their positions. (Matter of Sugden v. Partridge, 174 N. Y. 87; Matter of Fornara v. Schroeder, supra; Opinion of the Attorney-General, 24 State Dept. Rep. 383. See, also, Matter of Sandford v. Finegan, N. Y. L. J. March 10, 1937, p. 1201.)

The motion is accordingly granted. Settle order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 Misc. 847, 6 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinsella-v-kern-nysupct-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack