Kinoy v. District of Columbia

232 A.2d 91, 1967 D.C. App. LEXIS 180

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Having considered the various points raised by appellant, we are of the opinion that the facts of the case are adequately discussed and the law correctly analyzed and applied in the well reasoned opinion of Judge (now Chief Judge) Greene denying the motion in arrest of judgment.¹

Affirmed.

Footnotes

1

. See also United States v. Woodard, 376 F.2d 136 (7th Cir. 1967), affirming convictions for disorderly conduct during hearings by the House Committee on Un-American Activities.