Kinnon v. Yager

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Kinnon v. Yager

380 S.W.2d 259, 1964 Ky. LEXIS 303

DecidedJune 26, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 380 S.W.2d 259 (Kinnon v. Yager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinnon v. Yager, 380 S.W.2d 259, 1964 Ky. LEXIS 303 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

This petitioner, convicted for armed robbery, has sought to mandamus the respondent to supply the record of his post-conviction proceeding to this Court for consideration on appeal. The respondent has replied that the record will be supplied “within the due and normal course of business and within the said sixty days allowed by the Criminal Rules.” RCr 12.58.

Since the sixty-day period therefor does not expire until June 27, 1964, petitioner’s request for mandamus is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

This petitioner, convicted for armed robbery, has sought to mandamus the respondent to supply the record of his post-conviction proceeding to this Court for consideration on appeal. The respondent has replied that the record will be supplied “within the due and normal course of business and within the said sixty days allowed by the Criminal Rules.” RCr 12.58.

Since the sixty-day period therefor does not expire until June 27, 1964, petitioner’s request for mandamus is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

380 S.W.2d 259, 1964 Ky. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinnon-v-yager-kyctapp-1964.