Kinney's Administrator v. Lockwood

1 Wright 340
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1833·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

WRIGHT, J.

The general rule is, that a party recovering judgment shall recover costs. Our administration law excepts administrators from this rule in certain cases. If the suit is brought within eighteen months after the date of the letters of administration, or within the time allowed for the settlement, no costs are recovered. They may'be recovered in suits brought after that time, or in suits brought after a year, if the demand has been presented to the administrator, ten days and rejected, and a recovery is had of the amount of the demand rejected; 29 O. L. 237. There are cases, therefore, in which a judgment may be rendered against an administrator for costs; and the party who would establish the position, that a court erred in its judgment, should be prepared to show the error on the record. A court of error will not presume an inferior court erred. In this case it nowhere appears, but the case below was one where the court might give judgment for costs. Judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinney's Administrator v. Lockwood, 1 Wright 340 (Ohio 1833).

1 Wright 340 (Kinney's Administrator v. Lockwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hays v. Commonwealth ex rel. McCutcheon
82 Pa. 518 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1877)
Jones & Nimick Manufacturing Co. v. Commonwealth
69 Pa. 137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)
Union Improvement Co. v. Commonwealth
69 Pa. 140 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)
City of Pittsburg v. First National Bank
55 Pa. 45 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1867)
Commonwealth v. Fayette County Railroad
55 Pa. 452 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1867)
Southwark Railroad v. City of Philadelphia
47 Pa. 314 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1864)