Kinney v. Winter
1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109
Opinion
The Circuit Judge held that the agreement upon which the money had been deposited was without consideration and void (Millard v. Canfield, 5 Wend. 61), and that the plaintiff, was entitled to recover.
Verdict for plaintiff
Marvin, for plaintiff.
H. V. Cowles, for defendant.
[This case was carried to the Court of Appeals, where the foregoing principle was affirmed, but the judgment was reversed, and a new trial granted on another ground. 1 N. Y. Reports 365.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kinney v. Winter, 1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109 (Kinney v. Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Millard v. Canfield
5 Wend. 61 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)