Kinney v. Winter

New York Circuit Court

Kinney v. Winter

1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109

DecidedMay 26, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109 (Kinney v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinney v. Winter, 1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

The Circuit Judge held that the agreement upon which the money had been deposited was without consideration and void (Millard v. Canfield, 5 Wend. 61), and that the plaintiff, was entitled to recover.

Verdict for plaintiff

Marvin, for plaintiff.

H. V. Cowles, for defendant.

[This case was carried to the Court of Appeals, where the foregoing principle was affirmed, but the judgment was reversed, and a new trial granted on another ground. 1 N. Y. Reports 365.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Circuit Judge held that the agreement upon which the money had been deposited was without consideration and void (Millard v. Canfield, 5 Wend. 61), and that the plaintiff, was entitled to recover.

Verdict for plaintiff

Marvin, for plaintiff.

H. V. Cowles, for defendant.

[This case was carried to the Court of Appeals, where the foregoing principle was affirmed, but the judgment was reversed, and a new trial granted on another ground. 1 N. Y. Reports 365.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinney-v-winter-nycirct-1845.

Opinion

H. V. Cowles, for defendant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack