Kinney v. Steiner Bros.

43 So. 25, 149 Ala. 104, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 266
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 5, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 43 So. 25 (Kinney v. Steiner Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinney v. Steiner Bros., 43 So. 25, 149 Ala. 104, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 266 (Ala. 1907).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J. —

Appeal from decree overruling pleas. The bill is filed under Code 1896, § 809 et seq., to quiet, title. In all cases, it is indispensable to the maintenance of such a bill that it be averred, and sustained in the proof, that the . complainant- is in peaceable possession of the subject of the complaint. The title of the complainant is not the prime consideration, but his peaceable possession at the time his bill is filed makes such a prima facie case as will bring into exercise the jurisdiction of the court to the end that the defendant’s claim or right may be determined and declared. — Code 1896, § § 809-812; Kendrick v. Colyar, 143 Ala. 597, 42 South. 110. Section 811 of the Code prescribes what shall appear by the answer, if defendant claim the estate, or any interest in it, and requires specific avowal of the extent, character, and source of his claim. There is no room, under the statute, for a plea. The statute must be pursued. Dan Ch. Pr. pp. 702, 703. Besides, it would be manifestly unnecessary, if permissible, to permit, as some of the pleas do, a mere traverse of facts [106]*106upon which the survival of the bill depends. The decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Tyson, O. J., and Dowdell and Anderson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Childress
111 So. 2d 8 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Reeder v. Cox
118 So. 338 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Adams v. Pollak
117 So. 299 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Davis v. Daniels
85 So. 797 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 So. 25, 149 Ala. 104, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinney-v-steiner-bros-ala-1907.