Kinney v. South & North Alabama Railroad

73 Ala. 536
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1883·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the court below, after verdict and judgment had been rendered against him, made a motion for a new trial. The motion was regularly continued from term to term, and a stay of execution ordered pending the determination of the motion. While that motion was undetermined, and still pending in the circuit court, this appeal was taken.

We are of opinion that the motion to dismiss the appeal must prevail. There is no such final judgment as will support an appeal, and the cause must be dismissed.— Overton v. State, 60 Ala. 73; Montevallo Coal Mining Co. v. Reynolds, 44 Ala. 252.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinney v. South & North Alabama Railroad, 73 Ala. 536 (Ala. 1883).

73 Ala. 536 (Kinney v. South & North Alabama Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crane Bros. & Co. v. Richardson
73 Miss. 254 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1895)
Fisk v. Henarie
13 P. 760 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)