Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.

213 F. 449, 130 C.C.A. 586, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1903
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 1914
DocketNo. 1,057
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 213 F. 449 (Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 213 F. 449, 130 C.C.A. 586, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1903 (1st Cir. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court, having fully considered the affidavit of prejudice filed by the plaintiff in error on March 10, 1914, and the brief in support-thereof, is of the opinion that the statute under which the affidavit is filed, namely, section 21 of the Judicial Code of March 3, 1911, is so framed that evidently it does not apply to an appellate tribunal. Consequently the affidavit must be dismissed.

Ordered that the affidavit filed by the plaintiff in error on March 10, 1914, entitled “An Affidavit of Prejudice under the Statute of March 3, 1911,” is dismissed, and the case will stand for trial in the order heretofore assigned to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Re Harriet Bouslog, an Attorney at Law
41 Haw. 270 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1956)
In re Sawyer
41 Haw. 270 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1956)
Saunders v. Piggly Wiggly Corporation
1 F.2d 582 (W.D. Tennessee, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 F. 449, 130 C.C.A. 586, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinney-v-plymouth-rock-squab-co-ca1-1914.