Kinney v. Kinney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kinney v. Kinney

49 So. 3d 343, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19822, 2010 WL 5381756

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 29, 2010

Docket2D09-5932

StatusPublished

This text of 49 So. 3d 343 (Kinney v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinney v. Kinney, 49 So. 3d 343, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19822, 2010 WL 5381756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Michael James Kinney, the Husband, appeals an order denying his motion for modification of a judgment of dissolution of marriage. The judgment of dissolution anticipates further judicial labor on the issue of “retroactive child support,” and it is not final in this respect. In his motion for modification, the Husband, in essence, sought reconsideration of or rehearing on matters that either have not been finally determined by the trial court, including retroactive child support, or otherwise will not be at issue until the rendition of a final, appealable judgment of dissolution of marriage.- The order denying the Husband’s motion is a nonappealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, C.J., and LaROSE, J„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLY, Judge.

Michael James Kinney, the Husband, appeals an order denying his motion for modification of a judgment of dissolution of marriage. The judgment of dissolution anticipates further judicial labor on the issue of “retroactive child support,” and it is not final in this respect. In his motion for modification, the Husband, in essence, sought reconsideration of or rehearing on matters that either have not been finally determined by the trial court, including retroactive child support, or otherwise will not be at issue until the rendition of a final, appealable judgment of dissolution of marriage.- The order denying the Husband’s motion is a nonappealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, C.J., and LaROSE, J„ Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 So. 3d 343, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19822, 2010 WL 5381756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinney-v-kinney-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack