Kinney v. Corbin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kinney v. Corbin

19 A. 141, 132 Pa. 341, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 818

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 17, 1890

DocketNo. 153

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A. 141 (Kinney v. Corbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinney v. Corbin, 19 A. 141, 132 Pa. 341, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 818 (Pa. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The negligence in this case was not that of the defendant company, but of Missimer, the boss or foreman, under whom the plaintiff was working, and who was, under all our cases, a fellow-workman. This was of itself sufficient to justify the learned judge below in entering a judgment of nonsuit. Aside from this, he makes out, upon the uncontradicted testimony, a very strong case of contributory negligence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The negligence in this case was not that of the defendant company, but of Missimer, the boss or foreman, under whom the plaintiff was working, and who was, under all our cases, a fellow-workman. This was of itself sufficient to justify the learned judge below in entering a judgment of nonsuit. Aside from this, he makes out, upon the uncontradicted testimony, a very strong case of contributory negligence.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A. 141, 132 Pa. 341, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinney-v-corbin-pa-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack