Kinnetz v. Benaiah Holdings, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, D. South Dakota
DecidedAugust 15, 2025
Docket4:25-cv-04134
StatusUnknown

This text of Kinnetz v. Benaiah Holdings, Inc. (Kinnetz v. Benaiah Holdings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinnetz v. Benaiah Holdings, Inc., (D.S.D. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY A. KINNETZ REVOCABLE

TRUST, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:25-cv-04134-CCT vs.

BENAIAH HOLDINGS, INC., BENAIAH ORDER GRANTING TIMOTHY A. CAPITAL, LLC, BENAIAH DIGITAL, LP, KINNETZ REVOCABLE TRUST’S BENAIAH DIGITAL FIXED INCOME, LP, MOTION TO APPOINT A RECEIVER BENJAMIN PAUL WIENER, individually; JOSHUA DEWITT, individually, and CHRISTOPHER CHARLES HMIELEWSKI, individually, Defendants.

The above matter came before the Court on Timothy A. Kinnetz Revocable Trust (“Plaintiff” or the “Trust”)’s Expedited Motion to Appoint a Receiver (the “Motion”). Based upon the pleadings, exhibits, and proceedings herein, and the arguments of counsel, the Court ORDERS as follows: ORDER 1. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing on August 12, 2025, Plaintiff is entitled to the appointment of a receiver under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 66 and other applicable law. 2. The Court has reviewed the facts and information provided to it and has determined that Plaintiff has presented evidence of a potential fraud, that there is imminent danger of further dissipation of assets, and that Benjamin Wiener (“Wiener”) engaged in deceptive and misleading statements. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Appointment of Receiver 3. The Court has weighed the factors, as outlined in Aviation Supply Corp. v. R.S.B.I. Aerospace, Inc., 999 F.2d 314, 316 (8th Cir. 1993), and finds that evidence sufficiently supports appointment of a receiver over Benaiah Capital, LLC and Benaiah Digital, LP (the “Benaiah Entities”). The Court further finds that Lighthouse Management Group, Inc. (the “Receiver”) is

qualified to serve as receiver and as an officer of the Court. 4. The Receiver is hereby appointed as general receiver over the Receivership Property (as defined below) wherever situated, for a period commencing on the date of this Order and ending upon termination of such appointment by further Order of this Court. 5. The Receiver shall not be required to post a bond. Receivership Property 6. “Receivership Property” shall consist of: all now-existing and hereafter-acquired tangible and intangible assets of the Benaiah Entities including, without limitation, all of the Benaiah Entities’ accounts, accounts receivable, chattel paper (including, without limitation,

electronic chattel paper and tangible chattel paper), deposit accounts, documents, equipment, vehicles, general intangibles, contract rights, goods, instruments, inventory, investment property, letter-of-credit rights, letters of credit, patents, patent rights, copyrights, trademarks, trade names, goodwill, royalty rights, franchise rights, license rights, software, payment intangibles, receivables, claims, causes of action and other rights to payment; together with (i) all substitutions and replacements for and products of any of the foregoing; (ii) proceeds of any and all of the foregoing; (iii) in the case of all tangible goods, all accessions; (iv) all accessories, attachments, parts, equipment and repairs now or hereafter attached or affixed to or used in connection with any tangible goods; (v) all warehouse receipts, bills of lading and other documents of title now or hereafter covering such goods; or (vi) any money, or other assets of the Benaiah Entities. 7. The following assets and matters, owned or in the possession of the Benaiah Entities (collectively, the “Excluded Matters”), however, are specifically excluded from the

receivership and shall: (i) remain the sole responsibility of the Benaiah Entities, as applicable, and (ii) do not constitute Receivership Property: (a) Toxic and/or hazardous waste material, including the storage, handling, disposal, and/or clean-up of such toxic and/or hazardous waste material; and (b) Any pension, profit sharing, 401(k), retirement, health insurance, dental insurance, flexible spending account, or other employee benefit plan. 8. Any party, or the Receiver acting upon its own initiative, may bring a motion before the Court requesting to add to the estate the Excluded Matters, or any other matters or assets not previously made part of the Receivership Property. Receiver’s Powers and Duties 9. The Receiver shall have the powers and duties of a receiver under South Dakota

law and identified in SDCL Chapter 21-21, including but not limited to SDCL § 21-21-9, which are incorporated herein, as well as those powers reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes stated herein. In addition to, and not in abrogation of, the powers granted under South Dakota law and identified in SDCL Chapter 21-21, the Receiver shall also have the following powers which, unless otherwise stated, may be exercised without further order of the Court: (a) Collect the income and revenues of the Benaiah Entities and take control of the Receivership Property, including, but not limited to, the Benaiah Entities’ books and records; and specifically including all accounts (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any investment accounts) maintained by the Benaiah Entities at any financial institution including any bank, depository institution, investment institution, contractual institution, Virtual Asset Service Provider or cryptocurrency exchange (collectively, “Financial Institutions”); (b) To operate the business of the Benaiah Entities for a limited period, if such operation is in the best interest of the estate and consistent with the orderly liquidation of the estate,

including but not limited to hiring personnel to act on behalf of the Receivership Property, as appropriate; (c) Liquidate, operate, and sell the Receivership Property; (d) Enter into or modify any and all agreements that are necessary or advantageous to the liquidation, operation, or sale of the Receivership Property; (e) Continue or terminate any contract necessary to the liquidation, operation or sale of the Receivership Property; (f) Pursue or settle legal actions, claims or arbitrations on behalf of the Benaiah Entities, and in the Benaiah Entities’ name; (g) To pursue any claim or remedy that may be asserted by a creditor of the

Benaiah Entities for the benefit of all creditors, including insider preference or piercing the veil claims, and any fraudulent transfer claims; the Receiver shall have standing to bring such claims without further order of the Court; (h) Pay obligations previously incurred by the Benaiah Entities, but only if deemed necessary by the Receiver for the preservation or enhancement of the Receivership Property; (i) Apply the Benaiah Entities’ endorsement to any check received by the Receiver in the course of its duties and execute in the name of the Benaiah Entities any and all reports and other documents required to be executed in connection with the performance of the Receiver’s obligations hereunder; (j) Change the locks and/or security codes on all entry/egress points to any property owned, occupied or operated by the Benaiah Entities, and/or provide caretaking and/or

security staff to monitor, inspect, and protect any such property, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, if reasonably necessary to secure the Receivership Property; (k) Sign any and all documents of conveyance, including titles, necessary to transfer ownership of the Receivership Property; (l) Hire the Benaiah Entities’ personnel, employees or former personnel and/or employees whom the Receiver deems reasonably necessary to assist in the liquidation or sale of the Receivership Property under such terms and conditions as the Receiver deems advisable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barton v. Barbour
104 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kinnetz v. Benaiah Holdings, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinnetz-v-benaiah-holdings-inc-sdd-2025.