Kinnert v. Mathison Cooperage Co.
102 A. 391, 91 N.J.L. 328, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 261
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kinnert v. Mathison Cooperage Co., 102 A. 391, 91 N.J.L. 328, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 261 (N.J. 1917).
102 A. 391 (Kinnert v. Mathison Cooperage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.