Kinneman v. State

67 S.E. 682, 7 Ga. App. 627, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 433
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 6, 1910·No. 2505·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The objections made to certain portions of the charge are without material error, when considered with the entire charge; and there is some evidence to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Indictment for breaking and stealing from railroad car; from. [Whitfield superior court — -Judge Fite. Januarjr 22, 1910. Submitted March 22, Decided April 6, 1910. William E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Thomas C. Milner, solicitor-general, Maddox, McCamy <& Shipmate, George W. Stevens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinneman v. State, 67 S.E. 682, 7 Ga. App. 627, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 433 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

67 S.E. 682 (Kinneman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.