Kinneman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kinneman v. State

67 S.E. 682, 7 Ga. App. 627, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 433

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 6, 1910

Docket2505

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 682 (Kinneman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinneman v. State, 67 S.E. 682, 7 Ga. App. 627, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 433 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The objections made to certain portions of the charge are without material error, when considered with the entire charge; and there is some evidence to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Indictment for breaking and stealing from railroad car; from. [Whitfield superior court — -Judge Fite. Januarjr 22, 1910.

Submitted March 22, Decided April 6, 1910. William E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Thomas C. Milner, solicitor-general, Maddox, McCamy <& Shipmate, George W. Stevens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The objections made to certain portions of the charge are without material error, when considered with the entire charge; and there is some evidence to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Indictment for breaking and stealing from railroad car; from. [Whitfield superior court — -Judge Fite. Januarjr 22, 1910.

Submitted March 22, Decided April 6, 1910. William E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Thomas C. Milner, solicitor-general, Maddox, McCamy <& Shipmate, George W. Stevens, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 682, 7 Ga. App. 627, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinneman-v-state-gactapp-1910.