Kinne v. Kinne

45 How. Pr. 61
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Smith, J.

This action, so far as any question is raised in it for the decision of the court, was brought upon a promissory note of forty dollars, made by the defendant, when, as the referee finds, she was a married woman and had no separate estate, and was not, engaged in any business separate from her husband. The contracts of married women are still invalid at common law, when not given in the cases allowed by the statute of March 20th, 1860, entitled An act concerning the rights and liabilities of husband and wife.” This note is not saved by this or any other statute. The fact that the defendant had at the time an expectation to receive money upon the death of her husband, upon an ante-[69] nuptial agreement, does not vary the case or make the note valid. It was clearly void when given, and the decision of the referee holding it void was clearly right. The judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

(This case is now in the Court of Appeals.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinne v. Kinne, 45 How. Pr. 61 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

45 How. Pr. 61 (Kinne v. Kinne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commercial Credit Co. v. Davidson
112 F.2d 54 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
Nash v. Mitchell
3 Abb. N. Cas. 171 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)