Kinnard v. Moore

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Kinnard v. Moore

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 339

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided December 7, 1727·Published

Opinion

on Motion of Mr. Hume of the Complainant’s Council, It is ordered that Francis Lejeau, who was this day Produced sworne and Examined, as a Wittness for the Defendant and cross Examined by the Complainant do attend here on Monday next being the Eleventh of this Instant December by three of the Clock in the afternoon to give further Evidence in behalf of the Complainant of which he is not to fail as he will answer the Contrary.

J. Skene Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

on Motion of Mr. Hume of the Complainant’s Council, It is ordered that Francis Lejeau, who was this day Produced sworne and Examined, as a Wittness for the Defendant and cross Examined by the Complainant do attend here on Monday next being the Eleventh of this Instant December by three of the Clock in the afternoon to give further Evidence in behalf of the Complainant of which he is not to fail as he will answer the Contrary.

J. Skene Register

Kinnard v. Moore, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 339 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1727).

Pincite

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 339 (Kinnard v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.