Kinmon v. State
This text of 414 So. 2d 224 (Kinmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
An appeal is taken by Phillip Raoul Kin-mon from his conviction by a jury for possession of marijuana in excess of one hundred pounds. Finding no error, we affirm.
Appeal is also taken by Carol Cheshire from her conviction for possession of marijuana in excess of twenty grams. We agree with the trial court that the evidence permits an inference that the marijuana, located in a bedroom of which Cheshire had joint custody and control, was in plain view, and we therefore affirm on the authority of Winchell v. State, 362 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So.2d 462 (Fla.1979).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 So. 2d 224, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinmon-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.