Kinlaw v. Lowes Home Center Inc.

588 F. App'x 220
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 2014
DocketNo. 14-2109
StatusPublished

This text of 588 F. App'x 220 (Kinlaw v. Lowes Home Center Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinlaw v. Lowes Home Center Inc., 588 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Kinlaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and summarily dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kinlaw v. Lowes Home Ctr., Inc., No. 9:14-cv-02815-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinlaw-v-lowes-home-center-inc-ca4-2014.