Kinker v. State

458 So. 2d 392, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2291, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15692
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 392 (Kinker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinker v. State, 458 So. 2d 392, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2291, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15692 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reading the search warrant in this case is a whole, see Joiner v. City of Lakeland, 90 So.2d 118 (Fla.1956), the word “contraband” in the command clause of the warrant clearly refers to the controlled substances (cannabis and lysergic acid diethyl-amide) mentioned earlier in the warrant and specifies, with sufficient particularity, the things authorized to be searched for, and seized from, the defendant’s home. See Carlton v. State, 449 So.2d 250 (Fla.1984). Also see United States v. Leon, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. .3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. State
509 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 392, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2291, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinker-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.