Kinker v. Aberegg

Ohio Court of Appeals

Kinker v. Aberegg

177 N.E. 645, 40 Ohio App. 43, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 741, 1930 Ohio App. LEXIS 383

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 1930

DocketNo 228

StatusPublished

This text of 177 N.E. 645 (Kinker v. Aberegg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinker v. Aberegg, 177 N.E. 645, 40 Ohio App. 43, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 741, 1930 Ohio App. LEXIS 383 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

There is no doubt that the transaction involved was a gambling transaction, in connection with which Aberegg furnished $1,000.00 with the expectation that Kinker, to whom he gave the money, “would make it right”. The cognovit note in question was given by Fred Kinker and his father to take up a note previously given for the same amount, and both these notes were based upon the alleged debt arising from the giving of the said $1,000.00 to Kinker by Aberegg.

Under 5965 GC, the note involved in this suit is void and of no effect.

The judgment of the court below is re-

versed and final judgment rendered, for plaintiffs in error.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI