Kinkead v. Lysol Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kinkead v. Lysol Inc.

250 A.D. 832, 296 N.Y.S. 461, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 250 A.D. 832 (Kinkead v. Lysol Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinkead v. Lysol Inc., 250 A.D. 832, 296 N.Y.S. 461, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Karr v. Inecto, Inc., 247 N. Y. 360; Antowill v. Friedmann, 197 App. Div. 230; Willson v. Faxon, Williams & Faxon, 138 id. 359.) All concur, except Thompson, J., not voting. (The judgment dismisses plaintiff’s complaint in an action for damages for loss of services and care of plaintiff’s wife injured by use of a disinfectant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Karr v. Inecto, Inc., 247 N. Y. 360; Antowill v. Friedmann, 197 App. Div. 230; Willson v. Faxon, Williams & Faxon, 138 id. 359.) All concur, except Thompson, J., not voting. (The judgment dismisses plaintiff’s complaint in an action for damages for loss of services and care of plaintiff’s wife injured by use of a disinfectant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 832, 296 N.Y.S. 461, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinkead-v-lysol-inc-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack