Kingswood v. Michelman

470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5766, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 1972
Docket72-2100
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 470 F.2d 996 (Kingswood v. Michelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kingswood v. Michelman, 470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5766, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

470 F.2d 996

In the Matter of George Walter Kingswood and Gerd Kingswood,
Bankrupts.
George Walter KINGSWOOD and Gerd Kingswood, Appellants,
v.
Carlyle MICHELMAN, Trustee-Appellee.

No. 72-2100.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1972.

Joel Mithers (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Sulmeyer, Kupetz & Alberts, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae.

Before BARNES, KOELSCH, and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Order of the District Court, D.C. Cal., 343 F.Supp. 498, is reversed and the cause remanded for disposition in line with our opinion In the Matters of Clyde R. James and Michael W. Cedor, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manchester v. Annis (In Re Annis)
229 B.R. 802 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5766, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingswood-v-michelman-ca9-1972.