Kingswood South, Inc. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc.
This text of 686 So. 2d 700 (Kingswood South, Inc. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final judgment denying Appellant’s claim for attorney’s fees is affirmed. Howev[701]*701er, we remand so that the trial court may consider that portion of Appellant’s motion to tax costs that remains pending to the extent, if any, that Appellant may have incurred taxable costs, exclusive of attorney’s fees, prior to the dismissal of Spring Lock’s claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 700, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13406, 1996 WL 734793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingswood-south-inc-v-spring-lock-scaffolding-inc-fladistctapp-1996.