Kingston v. Breslin

25 A.D.3d 657, 807 N.Y.S.2d 315
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is a shareholder of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered May 27, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Kingston v Breslin, 25 AD3d 657 [2006] [decided herewith]). Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kingston v. Breslin, 25 A.D.3d 657, 807 N.Y.S.2d 315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

25 A.D.3d 657 (Kingston v. Breslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guarino v. North Country Mortgage Banking Corp.
79 A.D.3d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Kingston v. Breslin
38 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)