Kingston Bank v. Roosa

New York Supreme Court

Kingston Bank v. Roosa

2 How. Pr. 8

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 8 (Kingston Bank v. Roosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kingston Bank v. Roosa, 2 How. Pr. 8 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

Thought the authority of Sehoonmaker should be considered sufficient to receive the costs and stipulation as the agent of Pitcher. Sehoonmaker undoubtedly thought he had authority, and acted in good faith, and there was something due to the honor of the profession in such cases.

Motion granted without costs, plaintiffs’ attorney to stipulate and pay costs of last motion in twenty days.

Another cause between the same parties, upon the same state of facts, decided the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewett, Justice.

Thought the authority of Sehoonmaker should be considered sufficient to receive the costs and stipulation as the agent of Pitcher. Sehoonmaker undoubtedly thought he had authority, and acted in good faith, and there was something due to the honor of the profession in such cases.

Motion granted without costs, plaintiffs’ attorney to stipulate and pay costs of last motion in twenty days.

Another cause between the same parties, upon the same state of facts, decided the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingston-bank-v-roosa-nysupct-1845.