Kingsley v. Miller
45 Cal. 95
This text of 45 Cal. 95 (Kingsley v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kingsley v. Miller, 45 Cal. 95 (Cal. 1872).
Opinion
The judgment must be affirmed. The facts alleged in the complaint are insufficient to avoid the bar arising upon the settlement (between the administratrix and the defendant as surviving partner) appealing to have been had in the Probate Court. (Williams v. Price, 11 Cal. 212.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farley v. Security-First National Bank
146 P.2d 249 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
45 Cal. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingsley-v-miller-cal-1872.