Kingsland v. Mateer & Harbert, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kingsland v. Mateer & Harbert, P.A.

18 So. 3d 1252, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15183, 2009 WL 3230333

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2009·No. 5D08-2544·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amended order of the trial court dismissing the third-party complaint filed by appellants, Robert Kings-land and B.K. Ranch, L.C., against the *1253 appellees, Mateer & Harbert, P.A., and Baker & Fuller, P.A. We note for the benefit of the parties and the trial court, however, that our disposition of this appeal does not serve as an adjudication on the merits of the current first-party claim by the appellants against the appellees.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amended order of the trial court dismissing the third-party complaint filed by appellants, Robert Kings-land and B.K. Ranch, L.C., against the *1253 appellees, Mateer & Harbert, P.A., and Baker & Fuller, P.A. We note for the benefit of the parties and the trial court, however, that our disposition of this appeal does not serve as an adjudication on the merits of the current first-party claim by the appellants against the appellees.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Kingsland v. Mateer & Harbert, P.A., 18 So. 3d 1252, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15183, 2009 WL 3230333 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

18 So. 3d 1252 (Kingsland v. Mateer & Harbert, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.