Kingsland v. Bartlett
This text of 28 Barb. 480 (Kingsland v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An application to open a sale under a judgment, on the ground of misapprehension as to the time of sale, or any other circumstances not affecting the regularity of the proceedings, must necessarily be addressed to the discretion of the court. And this discretion is regulated, as in every case where the court is called to exercise it, by the consideration whether, from the collateral facts, the conduct of the parties, and perhaps the amount for which the property was sold, it would be •expedient, in justice to all concerned, including the purchaser, to order a resale. This excludes the idea of any right, on the subject. There can be no right where no legal mistake has been committed by those who have conducted "the proceedings. There maybe hard-? [481]*481ship, hut this is entirely for the consideration of the judge who hears the application.
Davies, Clerke and Ingraham,, Justices.]
I think, therefore, the appeal should he dismissed, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Barb. 480, 1858 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingsland-v-bartlett-nysupct-1858.