Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

368 S.W.3d 243, 2012 WL 1033571, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 413

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2012·No. No. ED 96679·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (“State Farm”), appeals [244] from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P. (“Kings-land”), in Kingsland’s action for equitable garnishment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (“State Farm”), appeals [244] from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P. (“Kings-land”), in Kingsland’s action for equitable garnishment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 368 S.W.3d 243, 2012 WL 1033571, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

368 S.W.3d 243 (Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.