Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. Schaefer Group, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. Schaefer Group, Inc.

349 S.W.3d 380, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 990, 2011 WL 3107796

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 2011·No. ED 95448·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation, appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P., in Kingsland’s action for equitable garnishment. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation, appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P., in Kingsland’s action for equitable garnishment. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. Schaefer Group, Inc., 349 S.W.3d 380, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 990, 2011 WL 3107796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

349 S.W.3d 380 (Kingsland Investments, L.P. v. Schaefer Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.